Author Archives: Michael Difensore

More Proof Of Plandemic: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Funded Technology That Embeds Immunization Records Into A Child’s Skin Last Year And Could Be Used For Forced Vaccinations For Covid-19.

download (33)

Invisible Ink Could Reveal whether Kids Have Been Vaccinated.

Source: scientificamerican.com

By Karen Weintraub on December 18, 2019

The technology embeds immunization records into a child’s skin.

B3917CB6-E8FB-4268-8E854DEFB9481337_source

M.I.T. engineers have developed a way to store medical information under the skin, using a quantum dot dye that is delivered, along with a vaccine, by a microneedle patch. The dye, which is invisible to the naked eye, can be read later using a specially adapted smartphone. Credit: Second Bay Studios

Keeping track of vaccinations remains a major challenge in the developing world, and even in many developed countries, paperwork gets lost, and parents forget whether their child is up to date. Now a group of Massachusetts Institute of Technology researchers has developed a novel way to address this problem: embedding the record directly into the skin.

 

Along with the vaccine, a child would be injected with a bit of dye that is invisible to the naked eye but easily seen with a special cell-phone filter, combined with an app that shines near-infrared light onto the skin. The dye would be expected to last up to five years, according to tests on pig and rat skin and human skin in a dish.

The system—which has not yet been tested in children—would provide quick and easy access to vaccination history, avoid the risk of clerical errors, and add little to the cost or risk of the procedure, according to the study, published Wednesday in Science Translational Medicine.

“Especially in developing countries where medical records may not be as complete or as accessible, there can be value in having medical information directly associated with a person,” says Mark Prausnitz, a bioengineering professor at the Georgia Institute of Technology, who was not involved in the new study. Such a system of recording medical information must be extremely discreet and acceptable to the person whose health information is being recorded and his or her family, he says. “This, I think, is a pretty interesting way to accomplish those goals.”

The research, conducted by M.I.T. bioengineers Robert Langer and Ana Jaklenec and their colleagues, uses a patch of tiny needles called microneedles to provide an effective vaccination without a teeth-clenching jab. Microneedles are embedded in a Band-Aid-like device that is placed on the skin; a skilled nurse or technician is not required. Vaccines delivered with microneedles also may not need to be refrigerated, reducing both the cost and difficulty of delivery, Langer and Jaklenec say.

Delivering the dye required the researchers to find something that was safe and would last long enough to be useful. “That’s really the biggest challenge that we overcame in the project,” Jaklenec says, adding that the team tested a number of off-the-shelf dyes that could be used in the body but could not find any that endured when exposed to sunlight. The team ended up using a technology called quantum dots, tiny semiconducting crystals that reflect light and were originally developed to label cells during research. The dye has been shown to be safe in humans.

inline_1_mchugh2HR

A close-up microscope image of the microneedle array, which could deliver quantum dots into skin. Credit: K.J. McHugh et al. Science Translational Medicine (2019)

The approach raises some privacy concerns, says Prausnitz, who helped invent microneedle technology and directs Georgia Tech’s Center for Drug Design, Development and Delivery. “There may be other concerns that patients have about being ‘tattooed,’ carrying around personal medical information on their bodies or other aspects of this unfamiliar approach to storing medical records,” he says. “Different people and different cultures will probably feel differently about having an invisible medical tattoo.”

When people were still getting vaccinated for smallpox, which has since been eradicated worldwide, they got a visible scar on their arm from the shot that made it easy to identify who had been vaccinated and who had not, Jaklenec says. “But obviously, we didn’t want to give people a scar,” she says, noting that her team was looking for an identifier that would be invisible to the naked eye. The researchers also wanted to avoid technologies that would raise even more privacy concerns, such as iris scans and databases with names and identifiable data, she says.

inline_2_mchugh3HR

The quantum dots after being administered in the skin of rodents. Credit: K.J. McHugh et al. Science Translational Medicine (2019)

The work was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and came about because of a direct request from Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates himself, who has been supporting efforts to wipe out diseases such as polio and measles across the world, Jaklenec says. “If we don’t have good data, it’s really difficult to eradicate disease,” she says.

The researchers hope to add more detailed information to the dots, such as the date of vaccination. Along with them, the team eventually wants to inject sensors that could also potentially be used to track aspects of health such as insulin levels in diabetics, Jaklenec says.

This approach is likely to be one of many trying to solve the problem of storing individuals’ medical information, says Ruchit Nagar, a fourth-year student at Harvard Medical School, who also was not involved in the new study. He runs a company, called Khushi Baby, that is also trying to create a system for tracking such information, including vaccination history, in the developing world.

Working in the northern Indian state of Rajasthan, Nagar and his team have devised a necklace, resembling one worn locally, which compresses, encrypts and password protects medical information. The necklace uses the same technology as radio-frequency identification (RFID) chips—such as those employed in retail clothing or athletes’ race bibs—and provides health care workers access to a mother’s pregnancy history, her child’s growth chart and vaccination history, and suggestions on what vaccinations and other treatments may be needed, he says. But Nagar acknowledges the possible concerns all such technology poses. “Messaging and cultural appropriateness need to be considered,” he says.

U.S. Federal Reserve And U.S. Government To Use Corona Virus For Excuse To Get Rid Of Cash.

download (31)

Digital Dollar And Digital Wallet Bill Surfaces In The U.S. Senate.

Source: Forbes.com

By Jason Brett

Updated 3/24/20 11:35pm: New bill text inserted at the bottom with press release from the bill sponsor.

A bill has surfaced in the Senate called the ‘Banking For All Act’, sponsored by the Ranking Member of the Senate Banking Committee, U.S. Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH). In the press release, Senator Brown lays out the details of his bill as well as how he looks forward to urging his colleagues to include it as part of the coronavirus economic stimulus package.

‘At the height of this pandemic we must do more to protect the financial wellbeing of hardworking Americans and consumers. They are on the front lines of this crisis and are already feeling the effects of the economic fallout. My legislation would allow every American to set up a free bank account so they don’t have to rely on expensive check cashers to access their hard-earned money.’

Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH)

This bill offers a definition for digital dollars as well as for a digital dollar wallet, and provides the provision for a pass-through digital dollar wallet with the mandate for all member banks to open and maintain digital dollar wallets for all persons, including those eligible to receive the stimulus.

Member Vs. Non-Member Banks In The United States

In the United States, the vast majority of banks, with the exception of the big banks such as Wells Fargo that are supervised by the OCC, have the option to be members of the Federal Reserve and to buy shares in the Reserve as a way of becoming a ‘member bank.’ These banks are then supervised and regulated by the Federal Reserve. A ‘non-member bank’ is a bank that chooses not to be a ‘member’ of the Federal Reserve and is regulated by the FDIC.

For large banks, there is a provision in the bill that online applications for pass-through digital wallets must be made available. The pass-through digital wallet contains consumer protection terms where it notes the wallet ‘shall not be subject to any account fees, minimum balances, or maximum balances and shall pay interest at a rate not below the greater of the rate of interest on required reserves and the rate of interest on excess reserves’.

Federal Reserve Banks and the U.S. Postal ‘Banking’ Service

From one institution that likely most Americans have never even entered, the Federal Reserve, to the Post Office, where sometimes daily visits can be part of a person’s routine, this bill includes mandates for each agency to assist in the supply of digital dollar wallets for all. The Federal Reserve may maintain digital dollar wallets. And for low-income areas where the Federal Reserve may not be able to have a branch, the Fed will partner with postal retail facilities to carry out this mandate. For access to the digital cash, ATMs will be provided at U.S. Post Offices.

Now that both Chambers – the House and the Senate – have legislation introduced within both the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee, it does appear that the concept of digital dollars is one that Congress realizes reaches beyond the current coronavirus crisis, and may become a bi-partisan issue. With concerns over China and other countries developing a CBDC, the U.S. might be using this bill to introduce its own digital currency – and also be looking to solve one of the oldest policy issues of all in reaching out to offering banking services to the unbanked and underbanked.

111648cb-5b21-4840-ac9a-1b99c4db1c14
Fed Just Revealed Plans for Digital Dollar Replacement.

Source: Newsmax.com
 

Thanks to the Federal Reserve, the idea that you can go into a store and anonymously purchase something with cash might soon be obsolete.

Why? Because they’re developing something called Fedcoin, which would be based on blockchain technology.

If you’re unfamiliar with blockchain technology, you’re not alone. Here’s how a piece on Motley Fool describes it:

The digital and decentralized ledger that records all transactions. Every time someone buys digital coins on a decentralized exchange, sells coins, transfers coins, or buys a good or service with virtual coins, a ledger records that transaction, often in an encrypted fashion, to protect it from cybercriminals. These transactions are also recorded and processed without a third-party provider, which is usually a bank.

Right now, Bitcoin is a popular form of cryptocurrency that operates using blockchain technology. Like the description above, Bitcoin is decentralized, its transactions are anonymous, and no central bank is involved.

But the irony is, the blockchain tech behind the Fed’s idea isn’t likely to be used the way Bitcoin uses it. Not even close.

Originally, the “Fedcoin” idea appeared to be a security enhancement to a century-old system used for clearing checks and cash transactions called Fedwire. According to NASDAQ in 2017:

This technology will bring Fedwire into the 21st Century. Tentatively called Fedcoin, this Federal Reserve cryptocurrency could replace the dollar as we know it.

The idea didn’t seem to move very much three years ago, but now the idea of a central bank-controlled “Fedcoin” seems like it could be moving closer to reality, according to a Reuters report from February 5.

According to the report, “Dozens of central banks globally are also doing such work,” including China.

Of course, there is risk, according to Federal Reserve Governor Lael Brainard. For example, there is the potential for a country-wide run on banks if panic ensued while the Fed “flipped a switch” and made Fedcoin the primary currency for the United States.

But blogger Robert Wenzel warns the risks of the Federal Reserve issuing its own cyber currency may run even deeper than that.

“This is not good.”

Lawmakers try to package and sell whatever ideas they come up with, no matter how intrusive or ineffective they might be.

According to Brainard, Fedcoin has the potential to provide “greater value at a lower cost” for monetary transactions. Sounds reasonable, if taken at face value.

But no matter how the Fed may try to “sell” the idea of utilizing Fedcoin in the future, Wenzel’s warning is pretty clear:

A Federal Reserve created digital coin could be one of the most dangerous steps ever taken by a government agency. It would put in the hands of the government the potential to create a digital currency with the ability to track all transactions in an economy—and prohibit transactions for any reason. In terms of future individual freedom, this would be a nightmare.

If you use cash at a grocery store, no one will know who you are or what you bought unless it was caught on video or you use a reward card. In the rare instance a store accepts Bitcoin, the same would be true.

But if you were to use a centrally-controlled digital currency like Fedcoin, who knows what the Fed will decide to track now or in the future? Or what meddling they could come up with to deny your transaction?

If the Federal Reserve wanted to outlaw cash, and your only choice was to use Fedcoin to make purchases, then your financial life would be tracked under their watchful eye.

“Not good” indeed.

Protect your retirement by maintaining your financial freedom

Who knows if the Federal Reserve will move closer to making cash a thing of the past? Perhaps Fedcoin will add to the number of ways the Fed can meddle with your retirement?

Until that gets sorted out, you can consider other options to protect your retirement with a tangible asset that can’t be converted into digital form.

Precious metals like gold and silver continue to hold value, and have for thousands of years. And because they are physical assets, you can’t be tracked as you could if Fedcoin moves from being a bad idea to reality.

Bill Gates & World Economic Forum (U.N.) Ran Coronavirus Outbreak Simulation Just 6 Weeks Before The Real Outbreak Started In China. United Nations Released Biological Weapon On World.

download (30)

Source: JamesFetzer.org

In this report we take an inside look at Event 201, which took place in NYC on October 18 2019.

Event 201 is a high-level pandemic exercise hosted by the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

This is extremely fascinating because this pandemic simulation exercise of coronavirus took place about 6 weeks before the first illness from the coronavirus was actually reported in Wuhan, China.

That is one hell of a coincidence if you believe in that sort of thing.

Another fascinating connection is the fact that not only did the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation participate in and help set up the pandemic simulation of a coronavirus outbreak, but they just so happen to fund the group who owns the patent to the deadly coronavirus and are already working on a vaccine to solve the current crisis.

Again, an incredible coincidence…

In this report you will see footage from inside the event from the members of the emergency epidemic board in this simulation consisting of representatives from major banks, the UN, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Johnson and Johnson, logistical powerhouses, the media as well as officials from China and America’s CDC just to name a few.

This simulation also includes news reports that were fabricated just for this exercise — please keep that in mind because they are eerily similar to reports we are currently seeing regarding this real-world coronavirus outbreak.

President Trump Joins Democrats In Attack On Congressman Thomas Massie From Kentucky. President Trump Very Wrong On This Issue.

  d4b5aa9ecad60fd770ecc72996aae743_M
     President Trump is wrong on this issue and should apologize. Fort Campbell soldiers were just sent to NYC to help with Covid-19. Congressman and Senators need to show up for a Roll call vote because they are serving the country also. It is unconstitutional to not have a roll call vote. A roll call vote allows for arguments to be presented by each individual congressman about the bill. I have no problem admitting when President Trump is wrong even though Trump as done great things as President so far on other issues. President Trump asking for Massie to be removed is Trump on a power trip and is very wrong. Covid-19 Is not above the U.S. Constitution. The fact of the matter is the U.S. Government can’t be trusted period. The U.S. government has been taken over by the communist United Nations a long time ago. WHO directs the CDC think about it. Lock and Load and stay safe.
                                                                                                                           By Michael Difensore
 

Trump Joins Democrats in Attack on Thomas Massie.

Source: Thenewamerican.com

Friday, 27 March 2020

In a shocking series of tweets, President Donald Trump joined with liberal Democrats in attacking Representative Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), essentially because Massie takes his oath to the Constitution seriously, opposes spending over $2 trillion without so much as a roll call vote, and for, well, being a conservative Republican.

“Looks like a third rate Grandstander named @Rep Thomas Massie, a congressman from, unfortunately, a truly GREAT state, Kentucky, wants to vote against the new Save Our Workers Bill in Congress. He just wants the publicity. He can’t stop it, only delay, which is both dangerous and costly,” Trump tweeted in response to the news that Massie would be attempting to force a recorded vote on the bill.

Despite Massie’s efforts, the bill passed with no roll call vote when he was unable to get support from any other member of the House.

Trump continued his Twitter storm against Massie (who sports a 99-percent score on the The New American’s Freedom Index, which scores members of Congress according to their fidelity to the U.S. Constitution): “Workers & small businesses need money now in order to survive. Virus wasn’t their fault. It is “HELL” dealing with the Dems, had to give up some stupid things in order to get the “big picture” done. 90% GREAT! WIN BACK HOUSE, but throw Massie out of Republican Party!”

This is not the first time that Trump has attacked fellow Republicans who failed to go along with his agenda — even some of the most conservative members of Congress, such as Massie. Early in his tenure, Trump forcefully criticized the House Freedom Caucus for opposing some of his agenda, which they did not consider very conservative. When the group scuttled his healthcare overhaul in 2017, Trump was furious, tweeting, “The Freedom Caucus will hurt the entire Republican agenda if they don’t get on the team, & fast. We must fight them & Dems, in 2018!”

In subsequent tweets, Trump even lambasted individual members of the Freedom Caucus, comparing them to Democrats (which is, of course, ridiculous) and urging Republicans to “fight them” in the 2018 midterm elections if they continue to oppose him. To their credit, the Freedom Caucus did not buckle before Trump’s tirade, and have been among his best supporters in Congress. But they did not support his healthcare proposal, for it was not a free market solution any more than ObamaCare.

Later, Trump publicly castigated Representative Justin Amash, then a Michigan Republican, for not jettisoning his conservative principles and supporting the Trump agenda. Amash has since left the Republican Party, and become an Independent, even voting for Trump’s impeachment last year.

Now, Massie has moved into Trump’s crosshairs for opposing a $2.2 trillion spending bill. Of course, Massie has consistently opposed excessive government spending, even joking that the buttons members of the House push to register their votes on the House floor should be changed from “yea” and “nay” to “spend,” and “don’t spend,” USA Today once reported.

Massie explained his opposition to the bill. “This stimulus should go straight to the people rather than being funneled through banks and corporations like this bill is doing.”

Some Republicans rose to Massie’s defense, however, including Representative Chip Roy of Texas, who bluntly told the president to “back off,” adding, “Representative Thomas Massie is one of the most principled men in Congress & loves his country. He is defending the Constitution today by requiring a quorum. There’s nothing 3rd rate about that.”

Of course, Democrats predictably lambasted Massie. After Massie said, “I swore an oath to the Constitution, and I take that oath seriously,” Representative Dean Phillips (D-Minn.) caustically retorted, “Shameful. Your 428 colleagues take their oaths to the Constitution just as seriously. But unlike you, they take the health of their colleagues, Capitol staff, families, and communities seriously. That’s the difference. Even @realDonald Trump and I agree on that.” Phillips has a dismal 12-percent score on the Freedom Index.

It is certainly disappointing that Trump would make common cause with such a liberal Democrat as Phillips, even going so far as asserting, “By empowering the Radical Left Democrats, do nothing Kentucky politician @RepThomasMassie is making their War on the 2nd Amendment more and more difficult to win (But don’t worry, we will win anyway!). He is a disaster for America, and for the Great State of Kentucky!”

But perhaps the most shocking tweet of all was Trump’s response to the profanity-laced tweet of former Secretary of State John Kerry. Kerry tweeted, “Breaking news: Congressman Massie has tested positive for being an ***hole. He must be quarantined to prevent the spread of his massive stupidity. He’s given new meaning to the term #Masshole. Finally, something the president and I can agree on!

John Kerry

@JohnKerry

Breaking news: Congressman Massie has tested positive for being an asshole. He must be quarantined to prevent the spread of his massive stupidity. He’s given new meaning to the term . (Finally, something the president and I can agree on!) https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1243534441772974081 

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Looks like a third rate Grandstander named @RepThomasMassie, a Congressman from, unfortunately, a truly GREAT State, Kentucky, wants to vote against the new Save Our Workers Bill in Congress. He just wants the publicity. He can’t stop it, only delay, which is both dangerous……

Trump could have just not responded. Instead, Trump tweeted approval of the disgusting Kerry tweet: “Never knew John Kerry had such a good sense of humor! Very impressed!”

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Never knew John Kerry had such a good sense of humor! Very impressed! https://twitter.com/JohnKerry/status/1243552337429438464 

John Kerry

@JohnKerry

Breaking news: Congressman Massie has tested positive for being an asshole. He must be quarantined to prevent the spread of his massive stupidity. He’s given new meaning to the term #Masshole. (Finally, something the president and I can agree on!) https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1243534441772974081 

Constitutional conservatives who are serious about limited government are not very impressed — with Donald Trump — at least not with this episode.

 Image: Gage Skidmore / Wikimedia Commons

Steve Byas is a university instructor of history and government, and the author of History’s Greatest Libels. He can be contacted at byassteve@yahoo.com.

Related article:

Massie Fails to Force Roll Call Vote on Stimulus Package

 

 

U.S. Senators Accused Of Insider Trading, Dumping Stocks Before The Stock Market Fell For First Time Because Of The Corona Virus.

download (29)

Senators Accused Of Insider Trading, Dumping Stocks After Coronavirus Briefing.

Source: Forbes.com
By Jack Kelly
 

Our elected officials in Congress are supposed to look out for our best interests. In a shocking revelation, it’s been reported that a number of senators sold their stock holdings after being briefed about the coronavirus and the massive impact it will have upon the economy, jobs and the stock market. While telling the American public that there wasn’t much to worry about, they bailed out of their stock holdings to avoid large losses.

In a bizzare quirk, we’ve permitted our politicians to do things that we can’t. Prior to 2012, Congress members were not prohibited from insider trading. Senator Richard Burr from North Carolina was a fierce opponent of a bill that ultimately banned this practice. In an interview at the time, Burr said about the potential new law, “It’s ludicrous.” He voted against the Stop Trading on Congressional Knowledge (STOCK) Act and said, “I mean, it’s insane.”

The STOCK Act passed into law in 2012. It states that members of Congress, other government employees, congressional staffers, members of the executive branch and judiciary are not permitted to engage in insider trading gleaned from information ascertained through their jobs.

Burr’s vehement opposition to the STOCK Act is now coming back to haunt him. Burr, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, sold 33 stocks held by both him and his spouse. The value of the sales is estimated at between $628,033 and $1.72 million. Some of the stocks were in sectors hit hard by the outbreak.

In a prepared statement from Burr, he claimed:

Richard Burr

@SenatorBurr

My statement in response to reports about recent financial disclosures:

View image on Twitter
Georgia Senator Kelly Loeffler was also at the meeting with Burr. Loeffler sold stocks valued at around $1.275 million to $3.1 million in an apparent effort to avoid potential losses. She also purchased stocks in two companies that were deemed to benefit from the coronavirus, including one in a company that offers teleconferencing software, which would help people who are working remotely from home. 

Shockingly, Loeffler is a former executive at Intercontinental Exchange and married to Jeffrey Sprecher, the chairman of the New York Stock Exchange. Clearly, they should have been aware of how inappropriate this looks. It also opens them both up to regulatory—and possible criminal—investigations.

Loeffler’s office issued a statement early on Friday. “Sen. Loeffler does not make investment decisions for her portfolio,” the statement said. “Investment decisions are made by multiple third-party advisers without her or her husband’s knowledge or involvement.”

The Democratic senator from California, Diane Feinstein, who’s a ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, sold stock owned by herself and her husband valued at $1.5 million and $6 million between Jan. 31 and Feb. 18.

Tom Mentzer, a spokesperson for Feinstein, said, “All of Senator Feinstein’s assets are in a blind trust.” Mentzer added, “She has no involvement in her husband’s financial decisions.”

Oklahoma Republican Senator Jim Inhofe sold stocks on January 27 that amounted to about $400,000, according to his disclosure report. Inhofe said, in response to the accusations, that he didn’t attend the briefing and doesn’t have “any involvement” in making his investment decisions.

It is possible that the senators have their money in blind trusts and give full trading discretion to their financial advisors. Many wealthy people hire professional money managers to make buy and sell decisions for them. Even if this is the case, how can such high-profile elected officials allow their wealth managers to make these types of investment decisions? At face value, they look like they are flouting the law and taking advantage of private information only available to them. It’s frightening how arrogant or clueless they are to be unaware of how the public views this perceived breach of trust. At a time when we are depending upon our leaders in Congress, the appearance is that they are looking out for themselves.

Insider trading is a serious matter and can lead to investigations that result in possible civil and criminal indictments. People are now calling for probes into the senators’ financial dealings and demanding that they resign.

This scandal may be a tipping point. When he campaigned for the presidency in 2016, President Donald Trump was emphatic in his belief that regulations hold back businesses. One of his campaign promises was to limit the reach of regulatory agencies. By declawing the regulators, Trump believed that businesses would flourish, as they’re unencumbered by red tape and bureaucracy.

If the heinous actions of the senators prove to be true, it will place great pressure on Trump’s administration to reconsider its rollback of regulations. Regulators will become empowered. It would be reasonable to believe that investigations will be launched into other matters as well.

For example, regulators and the Department of Justice may decide to look into the companies that engaged in massive stock buybacks. When companies buy back their shares, the stock prices usually rise. Executives who receive stock and stock options greatly benefit from the appreciation in value of the company stock.

There are questions if this strategy played a part in over-leveraging the stock market—aiding its current collapse. Boeing, the large aircraft manufacturer that had several of its planes crash with accompanying allegations of faulty software and inadequate pilot training, is now asking the government for a bailout. The American public is now being asked to give the company money when it may have arguably engaged in a massive pump-and-dump-type scheme.

Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google and a handful of other companies have become incredibly powerful. The coronavirus outbreak may make these companies even larger, asserting even greater control over the economy. Their growth harms their thousands of small and midsize competitors. Antitrust reviews may be initiated to determine if they are abusing their monopolistic grip over their respective sectors to ensure that we don’t end up with a handful of dominant companies controlling our economy.

Accusations over privacy violations have been continually raised, but nothing really has changed. We’ve become resigned to the fact that everything we do will be surveilled and all of our information will be sold off to the highest bidder. This may be looked into as well.

If this administration—or whichever one comes into power after the presidential election—recognized the need to stop the deregulatory environment and ramp up investigations, reviews and examinations of these and other important matters, there will be a huge need for compliance, legal, audit, privacy and regulatory professionals.

Best Way To Beat A Virus Is To Take Ionic Nano Silver And Stop Listening To The United Nations W.H.O. And The Media.

download (1)

CantonTruth.blogspot.com And FourHorsemen66.com indorses the silver company below. May God Bless You. Click Link -Blue Ridge Silver.


https://blueridgesilver.com

Source: silveryguy.com

Put Colloidal Silver In Atomizer, Nebulizer or Ultrasonic Humidifiers and Breathe.

Similar to a nebulizer, using colloidal silver in its atomized form may be the final defence against an unseen enemy such as the coronavirus. The virus as with any virus, is a RNA-based entity that infiltrate cells and transform healthy cells into virus replicators.

The idea behind atomizing colloidal silver solution and inhaling it, seeks to allow the silver particles and colloids to coat the internal lung tissue and form a defensive layer to the aggressive virus attack.

Well, then…

How Does Colloidal Silver Work To Kill Viruses?

Viruses invade living cells in your body, and penetrate the nucleus of the same cell and make the cell reproduce virus instead of healthy cells. It’s this very subversive way of hijacking your healthy cells to do its dirty-work that causes the deadly symptoms because it destroys your healthy cells.

In the Coronavirus, it specifically targets the cells in your lungs which are known to have ACE2 receptors (which makes them the prime invasion point) and cause debilitating symptoms. Needless to say, that results in some seriously deadly forms of pneumonia which shows up as shortness of breath and difficulty breathing.

Having pneumonia go untreated is like dying from slow suffocation as your body is gradually being starved of much needed oxygen.

The newly reproduced virus will then make its way into your circulatory system via bloodstream which then makes you even sicker as it replicates copies of itself and destroys healthy cells in the process.

When a virus first invades a cell, part of the living cell reverts into its more primal cellular state and cell structure. The oxygen metabolising enzyme in the cell wall also similarly becomes a primal form of itself which is then chemically able to react with the incoming colloidal silver.

As a result, the primal form of the oxygen metabolizing enzyme then gets killed off by starving it of its ability to receiving oxygen, which also in-turn kills off the virus’ self-replicating process within minutes.

Yes, if you can get the colloidal silver to the area of infection, you give yourself a fighting chance of getting the virus replication under control.

How Do Silver Nanoparticles Work As An Antiviral?

Silver nanoparticles interact with HIV-1 based on their size. According to a peer-reviewed article on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, Silver particles were tested found to be able to bind with the virus and show an ordered spatial alignment. and have the capacity to be indeed virucidal depending on their size. In other words, to be effective virus-disablers, there needed to be sufficient small sized silver particles that would effectively create a “cap” that inhibited the virus from infectivity.

Although a typical solution of colloidal silver contains nano particles as well as ionic silver, it was the nanoparticles that proved 12 times more useful in the inhibition of viruses, versus ionic forms, at concentrations were at about 0.44 to 0.91 mg/mL.

Colloidal silver is so effective in being antiviral that its effects are still present 12 hours after cell infection with a HIV virus, which makes it a prime candidate for being a broad-spectrum antiviral agent not prone to pathogenic resistance.

In a nutshell, colloidal silver particles, when generated at a low constant current will yield particles at such small sizes that they are perfect to attache themselves to viruses and disable their ability to replicate themselves with any host cell.

This is truly nanotechnology working with medical science and it could save us from trying to outwit constantly evolving bacteria and viruses!

No One Likes A Worst Case Scenario – Colloidal Silver Can Fight Viruses And Bacterial Infection

In an ideal world, if you’re reading this, you’d get world-class treatment in event of catching the virus. I hope you don’t.

But in a global pandemic, there is a high possibility that hospitals will not be able to attend to all cases. Which means that some people will be left without treatment or waiting for treatment and may suffer worsening conditions as is the situation facing Wuhan.

Make no doubt about it. This virus is moving fast and the possibility of overloaded hospitals without enough beds or medical workers to attend to you is real.

Imagine if you could give yourself a fighting chance by using colloidal silver to reduce bacterial infection of your lungs and reduce the virus’ ability to replicate, I’d say that dramatically improves your odds.

note: I’m not a medical professional and using colloidal silver in an atomized form may have undocumented risks but if you have no known viable vaccine available, and if you’re in a bad spot, you will need to make your own judgment call on this. Having said that, I’ve used it as a nebulizer to great benefit and suffered no known ill-effects.

Source: BlueRidgesilver.com

What is Colloidal Silver?

Our Colloidal Silver is a pure, all natural clear liquid consisting of purified distilled water and submicroscopic nano-particles of 99.99% pure silver. It is manufactured by a non-chemical process resulting in the nano-particles of silver being held in suspension by an electric charge placed on each particle. Our colloidal silver is primarily ionic which has been tested and shown to be more effective than primarily particulate colloidal silver (see article below).

What does Colloidal Silver do?

When taken as directed, colloidal silver helps improve immune system health and functionality.
Is Colloidal Silver safe to take?

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Poison Control Center reports no toxicity listing for colloidal silver. These reports seem to reflect that it is considering it harmless in any concentration. Other studies and information also show that colloidal silver is safe, and when taken as directed colloidal silver has no negative side effects.

Historically, What has Silver Been Used For?

Silver has been used for centuries to disinfect water and promote good health. Herodotus, the first historian who lived 484-425 BC, claimed that no Persian king would drink water that was not stored in silver-lined vessels. It has been well documented that silver vessels were also used in ancient Greece and Rome to disinfect water and other stored liquids.

During the bubonic plague pandemic in Europe during the 1400’s that killed as many as 75 million people, the wealthy had a much lower mortality rate reportedly due to the fact that they regularly ate using silver utensils and drank from silver goblets.

The American settlers (1800’s) routinely place a silver dollar in barrels of liquids to avoid spoilage.

What are some Modern Uses for Colloidal Silver?

Today in the United States colloidal silver is widely used as a mineral supplement.

The US CDC endorses the use of silver in ceramic water filters for developing nations. NASA has also used silver to maintain water purity on the space shuttle. Colloidal silver is also used to disinfect clothing, to disinfect water, to disinfect hot tubs, to disinfect hospital surfaces and washing machine surfaces, and new practical uses are being discovered constantly.

For circumstances where the quality of drinking water may be questionable (esp. on travels) it is very good to know that a teaspoon of 5 ppm colloidal silver is able to disinfect 1 liter of drinking water within about 20 minutes. It will kill the most common pathogens at a concentration of over 200 CFU (Coli-forming Units) per ml of water. So, one 4-ounce bottle of 5 ppm colloidal silver can disinfect safely and surely approximately 32 liters of drinking water!

What is a Colloid?

A colloid is a collection of ultra-fine particles that do not dissolve but remain suspended in a solution. Blue Ridge Silver ultra-fine silver particles are so small they do not reflect natural light. That’s why our products are clear in appearance. The silver particles generally fall within the range of 0.0005 – 0.015 microns in diameter. These particles are electrically charged and so tiny that they remain suspended in water.

How is Colloidal Silver made?

Blue Ridge Silver produces colloidal silver slowly in small batches using generators that utilize an electrolysis process that causes extremely fine silver nano-particles to be suspended in distilled water.  This method replaces the need for any chemicals, stabilizers or proteins which have been shown to reduce product effectiveness, and the resulting product contains pure ionic colloids of silver.

Which is Better: Ionic or Particulate Colloidal Silver?

According to an article written by Steve Barwick of The Silver Edge who is a health journalist entitled, “Ionic Versus Particulate Colloidal Silver: the Great Debate,” ionic colloidal silver is better. Here’s an excerpt of Mr. Barwick’s article:

“Actually, ionic colloidal silver solutions are not in the least bit inferior to particulate colloidal silver solutions. Unfortunately, the myth that the particulate form of colloidal silver is somehow superior to the ionic form has been perpetrated by some individuals on the internet who have a financial self-interest in selling an overly-expensive bottled commercial particulate-based colloidal silver product.

The reality is that the ionic form of colloidal silver is the form used in hundreds of clinical studies carried out since the early 1900’s. Even Dr. Robert O. Becker’s ground-breaking research into the effectiveness of electrically generated silver ions, conducted at Syracuse Medical University during the 1970’s and 1980’s, attributed the astonishing [benefits] of silver to the silver ion, i.e., the ionic form.

What’s more, Dr. Becker used a small electrical device that generated very low micro-amps of current in order to produce his silver ions within the human body — a device very much like the tiny colloidal silver generators used today which also exclusively make the ionic form of colloidal silver ingested by millions of people across North America…”
Does particle size matter?

Yes; particle size is a highly critical factor. Much of the effectiveness of any colloidal silver solution depends on the actual size and uniformity of silver particles. Large particles are much less effective in boosting immunity support. According to many researchers, the preferred particle size for optimum results and safety of use should be from 0.0005 – 0.015 micron or 0.5 – 1.5 nanometers in diameter. (one micron = one millionth of a meter). Blue Ridge Silver products particle sizes are well within this range.

Why is your colloidal silver clear or transparent?

An excellent indicator of the quality and particle size of Colloidal Silver is the color. As the size of each silver particle gets larger, the color of the solution changes from clear, to yellow, to amber, to brown or dark red or grey, to black. As particle size increases the silver particles reflect a broader range of light within the spectrum. Colloids of silver that are produced using the best electrolysis methods are lighter in color than the grind or chemically produced colloids, except in the case of some products that contain artificial food coloring to change the color. The ideal color of Colloidal Silver is clear to very pale yellow/amber.

How can I verify that colloidal silver really contains silver particles?

One way to verify the presence of silver is to pour some of the colloidal silver in a white cup or bowl, store it in a dry place, allow time for all the water to completely evaporate, and see the gray silver dust remaining on the bottom of the container.

Another way is to shine a laser light through the colloidal silver. The light from the laser beam will reflect off the silver particles. The higher the concentration of silver, the brighter the light appears.

In dim light using a red laser beam shining through the 5 ppm Blue Ridge Silver in a clear glass, you can barely see some of the millions of tiny silver particles because most of them are so tiny that even the laser light barely reflects off of them. Those millions of particles are as small as 0.8 nanometer (0.0008 micron) in diameter. That’s just a few times larger than the silver atoms themselves. The 5 ppm Blue Ridge Silver is perfect to take for regular daily maintenance as suggested or to take in more frequent intervals when extra immune support is needed for short periods of time

As you can see by the increase in laser light reflectivity compared to the 5 ppm Blue Ridge Silver, the 10 ppm Silver is made up of many more reflective particles of silver. The solution is still clear under normal lighting conditions. The 10 ppm Blue Ridge Silver is versatile for use in spray bottles to boost immunity when extra internal support is needed on the go.

The even more vibrant beam of laser light reflecting through the 25 ppm Blue Ridge Silver indicates the presence of even more laser-illuminated silver particles. But it’s interesting to note that although the reflected laser light is noticeably more intense with the 25 ppm silver than with the 5 and 10 ppm solutions, the particles still appear to be of a similar size, and the solution is still clear under normal lighting conditions. The 25 ppm Blue Ridge Silver is also perfect for use in spray bottles.

What about the ppm (mg per liter) – what concentration is best?

Many studies indicate that in the range of 1 – 50 ppm (parts per million or mg/l), colloidal silver is highly useful to boost the immune system. Studies also show that depending upon the method of production usually as the silver ppm increases the particle size typically increases as well. Therefore, low concentrations of colloidal silver typically contain the smallest silver particles which are typically more effective.

How does silver naturally get into the body?

We consume silver and many other minerals through the food we eat. So how does silver get into food? In plants silver along with many other minerals are absorbed and transferred into fruits and vegetables through organic soil where living organisms consume and break down the nutrients in the soil into sub-microscopic particles that are absorbed along with water in a colloidal state through the roots of the plant.

Then of course, by consuming those fruits and vegetables, the colloidal minerals are then transferred through the blood stream to the various tissues of our body. Hence, we consume silver in a tiny amounts from plants. We also obtain silver through the consumption of free range meats and wild caught fish. In fact, studies show that wild oysters and many sea weeds are very rich in silver.

Some researchers suggest that the produce from smaller farms that employ organic and sustainable practices is more rich in minerals like silver because the farms are surrounded by large trees whose roots go deep and absorb many minerals that transfer into the leaves that fall each year and decompose over the winter depositing those minerals into the topsoil for crop enrichment.

How much colloidal silver should a person take per day?
The US Environmental Protection Agency publishes a reference dose (Rfd) for silver which is an estimate of daily exposure to the entire population that is unlikely to be associated with a significant risk of adverse effects over a lifetime. The current Rfd for oral silver exposure is 5 micrograms/kg/day with a critical dose estimated at 14 micrograms/kg/day. Based on this Rfd, a 150 pound adult can safely and regularly consume approximately 350 micrograms/day or 70 ml (2.4 ounces) of 5 ppm colloidal silver per day or 950 micrograms or 196 ml (6.7 ounces) of 5 ppm colloidal silver per day for short periods of time.

Therefore, many people take up to 2.4 ounces of 5 ppm colloidal silver each day for daily immune system maintenance and larger amounts for short periods of time when their immune system is compromised. Just remember to drink plenty of water especially during the first week because usually large numbers of pathogens are rapidly exterminated within the body and the excretory systems work tirelessly to flush out the dead germs.

Are there any known side effects from using ionic colloidal silver?

Aside from the Herxheimer effect (described below), there are no recorded side effects in medical literature from the use of ionic colloidal silver unless the person is allergic to silver. Additionally there has never been a recorded case of a drug interaction. It is non-addicting, the body does not build up a tolerance to it, most is flushed out of a body within the first few days of consumption, and studies show that ionic colloidal silver is not deposited under the skin like silver salts and other silver compounds that have been shown to cause the greyish/blue skin condition called Argyria when taken in large doses over long periods of time.

Since colloidal silver kills germs, a detoxifying reaction can occur which is called the Herxheimer effect. This is a temporary flu-like condition resulting from the overloading of the body’s excretory systems caused by the massive die-off of pathogens. Therefore, if you begin to feel run down after first taking or increasing your consumption of colloidal silver, then reduce your intake for a few days and drink more water to aid in the body’s detoxification process. We cannot over stress the importance of consulting a licensed medical practitioner if you have serious concerns.
If it’s so great, why have so many never heard of colloidal silver before?

Prior to the discovery of electricity in the late 1800’s people who could afford to eat using true silverware and store or drink beverages in silver containers often unknowingly enjoyed many of the healthy benefits of silver.

With the discovery of Penicillin and other less expensive anti-biotics in the 1930’s and 40’s, the use of colloidal silver diminished. Recent breakthroughs in technology and manufacturing that have occurred within the past 40 years have brought the price down so that colloidal silver in now very affordable.

Numerous articles in medical journals of colloidal silver can be found dating before 1940. New articles and clinical trial results are appearing frequently as more people rediscover this safe and effective silver mineral solution.

Of course, many pharmaceutical companies work diligently to prevent people from learning about the many benefits of drinking colloidal silver in order to the protect their profits.
Do I still need to visit my family doctor if I use colloidal silver?

Always consult a medical doctor if your conditions look serious, begin to look serious, or if they persist or worsen. In no way do we even remotely imply that this product or any alternative methods should replace your family doctor.

How long has silver been used as a germ fighter?

For thousands of years. Silver is mentioned in the Bible. Royalty stored water in silver vessels in the belief that this water would help them maintain their health. Before refrigeration was invented, a silver dollar was placed in containers of milk to maintain freshness. Silver was used by the wealthy to help maintain good health before the advent of penicillin in 1938.
How Long will Colloidal Silver last?

Because the silver particles hold a positive charge, they, like many things, are affected by electromagnetic fields. If you store colloidal silver in sealed glass or PETE plastic containers away from extreme temperatures, electromagnetic fields, and sunlight, then you should expect ionic colloidal silver to keep for many years and perhaps decades without losing its effectiveness.

Can colloidal Silver be Given to Pets? 

Colloidal Silver can be given alongside other products recommended by your vet to help maintain health and vitality in your pets. Colloidal Silver has shown dramatic results in the case of very young animals such as foals and calves scouring. Given with a syringe by mouth twice daily it has the most beneficial effect.

Cats with absesses may be treated both internally and externally with good results. It has been observed that many animals gain weight and energy following a course of colloidal silver suggesting that their general wellbeing is enhanced.

For larger animals such as horses, symptoms such as coughs and colds, hoof absesses and eye infections respond best by administration of a high dosage for 5 days followed by the daily recommended allowance.

Remember to seek the advice of a registered veterinarian whenever you have questions about your animal’s health.

Communist Factions United Nations And Chinese Government Release Biological Weapon On the World In Response To President Trump’s Defunding Of U.N. And U.S. Trade War With China.

download (28)

CONFIRMED: CoVid-19 coronavirus found to contain unique “gain-of-function” property “for efficient spreading in the human population” … exact quote from science paper just published in Antiviral Research.

 

Source: BiologicalWeapons.news

02/19/2020 / By Mike Adams

We now have bombshell, smoking gun evidence that the CoVid-19 “Wuhan” coronavirus was specifically engineered as an offensive biological warfare weapon, designed to target to exterminate human beings.

A new study published in the peer-reviewed journal Antiviral Research (Vol. 16, April 2020) is entitled, “The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of the same clade.”

It reveals that the CoVid-19 coronavirus contains unique features that allow it to function as a more efficient weapon system for human-to-human transmission, which helps explain why the virus has been impossible to contain (even under “quarantine” conditions, which have universally failed in China, Japan, Korea and elsewhere).

As the science authors of the paper explain in the full text, “This furin-like cleavage site… may provide a gain-of-function to the 2019-nCoV for efficient spreading in the human population.” (Emphasis added)

Further, the science paper finds that there is no known viral ancestry to the CoVid-19 coronavirus, meaning it did not evolve from nature. It was engineered, and the science paper authors also state that the virus contains elements from MERS, stating, “Before the emergence of the 2019-nCoV, this important feature was not observed in the lineage b of betacoronaviruses.”

The abstract and full PDF (paid) of the study are available through this link at ScienceDirect.com:

 

The “smoking gun” aspects of this research were brought to light earlier today by Prof. Frances Boyle who appeared on the Alex Jones Show (2nd broadcast hour, Feb. 19th, 2020, InfoWars.com) to reveal his findings that confirm the Wuhan coronavirus was an engineered biological weapon.

The following graphic from the published study shows some of the S-protein sequences found in the CoVid-19 “Wuhan” coronavirus which share a nearly identical pattern with MERS-CoV, but not with any previous ancestry of “lineage b” type coronavirus:

 

The new feature engineered into the Wuhan coronavirus has, “the potential to cleave specifically viral envelope glycoproteins, thereby enhancing viral fusion with host cell membranes,” conclude study authors.

This feature results in, “higher pathogenicity, pronounced neural symptoms and neurotropism in infected chickens,” according to the paper. That means, essentially, it kills more easily and causes nervous system damage while infecting nerve cells. Note that many of the human victims in China appear to suffer seizures and a total, almost instantaneous nervous system shutdown, literally collapsing in seconds.

 

Furthermore, this enhanced property of the virus results in, “a widening of the cell tropism of the virus,” meaning it allows the virus to live and thrive in a much wider variety of human cells, including respiratory system cells. This means the virus lives in both respiratory cells and nerve cells.

Interestingly, the study further confirms that “ACE2” receptors are the vector of opportunity for the virus to infect human beings, stating, “ACE2 is also the receptor of the newly emerged nCoV.”

Additionally, the study finds that another element of the CoVid-19 virus appears to have been assembled from the SARS coronavirus, further confirming Frances Boyle’s claim that the engineered weapon is a “chimera” of multiple strains of biological weapons, including SARS, MERS and HIV. From the study: “Notably, the IFPs of the 2019-nCoV and SARS-CoV are identical, displaying characteristics of viral fusion peptides (Fig. 2).”

Engineered to attack the human respiratory system, but there may be a defense… (you won’t like it)

The CoVid-19 coronavirus is specifically engineered to exploit the biology of the human respiratory system. Again, from the paper text:

Since furin is highly expressed in lungs, an enveloped virus that infects the respiratory tract may successfully exploit this convertase to activate its surface glycoprotein (Bassi et al., 2017; Mbikay et al., 1997). Before the emergence of the 2019-nCoV, this important feature was not observed in the lineage b of betacoronaviruses.

Finally, study authors explain that people who have already been exposed to other viral infections may have enhanced immunity against the coronavirus. From the study:

…it was recently shown that in an effort to limit viral infections, host cells that are infected by a number of viruses provoke an interferon response to inhibit the enzymatic activity of furin-like enzymes.

Although we caution that this supposition is just theory (so far), it may turn out that one way to boost defenses against the coronavirus could be to get infected with a weaker respiratory virus first. Stated another way, people who routinely interact with the public and are exposed to a wide variety of in-the-wild circulating viruses may be automatically building improved defenses by overcoming other viral infections first.

This finding has huge implications for individuals who take vaccines, given that vaccines expose the human body to weakened viral strains that often fail to provoke the full response of “in-the-wild” viruses such as seasonal influenza. Although the research did not focus on this point, it might also turn out that people who routinely take seasonal flu shots could theoretically demonstrate a weakened immune response against the coronavirus, while those who avoid flu shots and allow their own bodies to naturally fight the flu each year will show enhanced immunity against CoVid-19 coronavirus.

Or, arguably, it might work the other way around, where people who routinely take more vaccines and are exposed to a wider variety of weaker strains therefore have more capacity to produce an “interferon response.” It’s too early to tell, but it certainly seems to be the case that people who are rarely or never exposed to other viral pathogens may be far more vulnerable to this one.

Refer to the “Hygiene Hypothesis” for more ideas on the ramifications of this research

 

US, China Sign Historic Phase One Trade Deal Six Days Before First Case Of Corona Virus Hits U.S.

Click Here: CDC Confirms First U.S. Case Of Coronavirus From China

 
 
 

Click Here: PRESIDENT TRUMPS RECORD AGAINST THE U.N. AND PUTTING AMERICA FIRST BETTER THAN ANY U.S. PRESIDENT EVER IN HISTORY.

 

 

Articles Around Internet That Support Covid-19 Is Man Made.

 

 

 
 

Viral Video Of Bigfoot Filmed At Salt Fork State Park In Ohio By Two Men.

Bigfoot 1

Source: By The [Cambridge] Daily Jeffersonian

Posted Feb 10, 2020 at 11:07 AMUpdated Feb 11, 2020 at 7:24 AM

It was just a leisurely walk in the woods — one they’ve done many times — but this time was different. This time, they spotted something that they say they’ll never forget.

It was Jan. 12 when two Ohio men found themselves staring at what they say resembled Bigfoot or Sasquatch in Salt Fork State Park.

“Should we even be here?” said Eric, one of the two men. Eric did not want his last name revealed.

The figure had the characteristics of Bigfoot — hairy, upright-walking, ape-like creature that dwells in the wilderness and leaves footprints. Depictions often portray them as a missing link between humans and human ancestors or other great apes.

Scientists have discounted the existence of Bigfoot, considering it to be a combination of folklore, misidentification and hoax.

Folklorists trace the figure of Bigfoot to a combination of factors and sources, including folklore surrounding the European wild man figure, folk belief among Native Americans and loggers, and a cultural increase in environmental concerns.

download (26)

“Bigfoot. Sasquatch. Yeti. Ohio Grassman. Whatever you choose to call it, it really is all the same creature. Very big, hairy and tall, averaging 6 to 8 feet tall. With foot prints averaging from 13 to 17 inches long. It has been rumored to live in Ohio since the mid-1700′s. It has also been rumored to live in Ohio’s largest State Park. Salt Fork. Over 36 sightings have been reported to Don Keating of Newcomerstown since the middle 1980s. With the huge amount of alleged ‘evidence’ coming from Salt Fork’s borders, Keating decided to host the ‘Annual Bigfoot Conference’ at Salt Fork starting in 2005,” according to the Cambridge Guernsey County Visitors and Convention Bureau website.

At Salt Fork State Park, there are three locations where a Bigfoot is said to have been spotted: Morgan’s Knob (where much of an episode of the Animal Planet television show “Finding Bigfoot” was filmed), Parker Road (also known as “Buckeye Trail”), and Bigfoot Ridge — the park’s primitive campground where Kathy Lee Gifford and Hoda Kotb filmed an episode of the “Today Show.”

In 2012, the Salt Fork State Park was named as one of USA TODAY’s Top Ten “Squatchiest” Places.

“Seeing the creature was scary,” said Nathan Gray, of Winterset, a crossroads located just east of Salt Fork State Park. “When I couldn’t see it anymore, that was terrifying.”

President Trumps Record Against the U.N. And Putting America First Better Than Any U.S. President Ever In History.

download (24)

CantonTruth: Public protests burning the Communist United Nations flag sounds better and better. Want to ban a flag start with this one.

 

Articles Below Supporting the video: Click Article to view.

Trump said set to halt funding for UN agencies, other groups that give PA, PLO full membership.

Trump’s UN Budget Cuts Funding; Some Agencies Would Get Zero.

Trump Tells Bankrupt UN to Find Money Elsewhere.

 

UN Summit: Transforming Your Kids Into “Climate Change Agents”

download

UN Summit: Transforming Your Kids into “Climate Change Agents”

Source: TheNewAmerican.com

Written by William F. Jasper
Thursday, 06 December 2012

Do your children (or grandchildren) have nightmares about the Earth melting or exploding due to human-caused global warming? Do they believe they have no future because our planet is dying, the icecaps and glaciers are melting, the sea levels are rising, islands and coastal areas are disappearing, polar bears and children are drowning, plant and animal species are rapidly going extinct, and extreme weather will soon make human life unbearable, if not impossible?

Frightening, not Enlightening

Fear of an impending Climate Apocalypse apparently afflicts millions of children and adolescents worldwide, according to news stories in the mainstream media over the past few years (see hereherehere, and here).

Psychologists, psychiatrists, teachers, and parents report that many children are depressed and fearful, have difficulty sleeping, and believe it is pointless to study or plan a career, since there is little hope for a livable future. As a result, many are experiencing serious psychological and physical health issues. This should not surprise anyone, considering that hundreds of millions of students have been captive audiences for Al Gore’s “documentary,” An Inconvenient Truth, (with many of them being subjected to multiple classroom showings) and other similar fare. After being continuously marinated in climate-change K-12 indoctrination in almost every subject area, it is little wonder that many kids suffer from depression and anxiety.

Classroom Child Abuse for a “Higher Cause”

However, many children turn their global-warming angst into activism, becoming little climate warriors who will work tirelessly to convert their peers, their parents, and local and national political leaders into supporters of “sustainable development.” And this, clearly, is what the proponents of “climate change education” intend. Climate change education, they say, must be “transformative” and turn young children and adolescents into “climate change agents.”

That is the message being delivered by officials of UNICEF, UNESCO, and other UN agencies and NGOs at the UN Climate Conference currently underway (November 26-December 7) in Doha, Qatar. Stephanie Hodge, education program specialist for UNICEF, was interviewed at Doha by Climate Change TV, a UN-funded television network dedicated exclusively to propaganda about the global warming and the supposed solutions to this “crisis” that can only be attained through UN-directed global action.

According to Hodge, our current climate change education is “antiquated” and in dire need of renovation. We should be asking, she said, “What is global citizenship? What are some of the global values that need to be imparted through local content?” Climate change education, says UNICEF’s Hodge, is “really about a process of change, about starting transformation through education.”

To help bring about this change and transformation, UNICEF, with help from its sister agency, UNESCO, has come up with a new curriculum guide, entitled, Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction in the Education Sector: Resource Manual, which Hodge held up for viewers to see.

The UNICEF Resource Manual opens with this paragraph, which is sure to intensify any climatic stress already being felt by students:

“I am the present and the future. A victim of climate change, I live in a region that is constantly affected by disasters. Hurricanes and floods are my reality.” — Walter, a 12-year-old boy from Belize

Of course, “Walter, a 12-year-old boy from Belize,” is almost certainly a fabrication of the curriculum developers at UNICEF. Or at least the words attributed to him have been crafted by adults. How many 12-year-old boys do you know who speak like that? Or 16-year-olds, for that matter? But in UN materials even 6-year-olds and illiterate aborigines speak profoundly and poignantly in perfect poetic cadence.

In an article entitled, “Forcing Global Warming Nightmares on Children,” Tom DeWeese, the publisher/editor of The DeWeese Report and president of the American Policy Center, reproduced an impassioned letter he received from an elementary school girl who was upset with him for not accepting the global-warming “consensus.” The letter dutifully regurgitated the UN/Al Gore talking points. It is unlikely that it was composed by the girl who sent it. However, even if she did actually cut-and-paste the text herself without the prompting and assistance of her teacher and/or “facilitator,” it is obvious that she did not arrive at her state of mental agitation by calmly and maturely evaluating a balanced menu of data and perspectives in the heated climate “debate.” She, as with millions of her peers, has been force-fed a steady diet of climate-change hysteria disguised as scientific fact.

The UNICEF Resource Manual makes frequent and reverential reference to the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) as the authoritative scientific source on all things related to climate, notwithstanding the fact that the IPCC has suffered repeated scandals and has been exposed as a thoroughly politicized tool that has slaughtered science in the service of a politically-driven agenda.

Parroting the IPCC, the Manual declares: 

Climate change will generally increase disaster risks — not only through the increased frequency and magnitude of extreme weather events and sea-level rise. As water becomes scarcer, agriculture is strained, ecosystems are degraded, and societies will become more vulnerable to hazards.

“Climate Change Agents”

A major (or the major) purpose of the Resource Manual, we are told on page 11, is “to help children become agents of change.” The term “agents of change” is used five times in the Manual. In addition, it twice refers to “adolescents as climate change agents,” and describes “the role of youth themselves as change agents in sustainable development.”

The glossary of the Manual provides this UN-approved definition of sustainable development: “Development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

Therein, of course, lies the rub. UN officials and bureaucrats will determine what “meets the needs of the present” and what level of consumption constitutes “compromising the ability of future generations.” And they have already stated, in numerous pronouncements and publications, that U.S. consumption and lifestyles — energy, automobiles, single-family homes, food, travel, etc. — are unsustainable. The even more extravagant lifestyles of the officials and their NGO choir that attend these profligate UN moveable feasts — such as the current Doha conference— however, are considered “sustainable.” Naturally.

The Manual declares: 

Climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction seek to manage uncertainty, reduce vulnerabilities and build resilience for communities at risk (see annex 1.1). Adaptation, by definition, will need to be derived from local solutions. The process can be similar across the education sector, but the outcomes must be specific, emphasizing an inclusive, bottom-up approach. Adaptation and risk reduction fall within the overall framework of sustainable development and should be viewed holistically through that lens. [Emphasis in original.]

Larded with all of the usual catchphrases and banal bromides, the UNICEF publication continues: 


In order to meet the rights of children and achieve sustainable development, we need systems led by young people and adults who think and act sustainably. We need these systems to permeate all levels of policy and planning, not just the national level. For quality education to be transformative, we need to see changes embedded in district, village and school development plans.

“The scaling up and mainstreaming of climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction needs to be ensured throughout the education sector,” the Manual states. This will be done, it says, through:

• Sector planning and budgets

• Policies and legislation

• Governance and school leadership

• Learning and teaching processes

• Infrastructure and facilities

• Teacher capacity strengthening and pedagogical training.

That’s fairly all-inclusive, no? However, if the good folks at UNICEF have left anything out we can rest assured that it is covered elsewhere in the resource manuals and other materials produced by UNESCO, which we will be examining momentarily.

But, back to the UNICEF Resource Manual, which tells us:

The ultimate goal of the resource manual is to ensure that all children may equitably exercise their educational and environmental rights in totality, as described in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). This goal includes increasing the number of children who are reached by the education sector and cultivating the knowledge, skills, values and ways of thinking that contribute to more sustainable and equitable development.

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child referred to above is, of course, the same controversial treaty that American parents and the U.S. Senate have been opposing for decades, pointing out that accepting the principles enshrined therein will negate parental rights and ratify the collectivization of our children as property of the global state.

There is an interesting, self-indicting paragraph in the Manual, which if accepted in any sensible reading of the text, would prohibit the very programs the Manual proposes. It states:

In a protective framework, acknowledging that since children’s capacities are still evolving, they have rights to protection on the part of both parents and the State from exposure to activities likely to cause them harm. This framework imposes obligations on States parties to protect these rights. [Emphasis in original.]

Very clearly, climate change indoctrination of the type being advocated by UNICEF is already doing immense harm to children. The articles we have linked to above quote a number of psychologists, psychotherapists, and counselors who attest to the unhealthy mental trauma children are experiencing as a result of global-warming propaganda overload. A much larger collection of sources, from studies and news reports worldwide can be accessed at Climate Lessons blogspot.

As the Manual states, children “have rights to protection on the part of both parents and the State from exposure to activities likely to cause them harm.” Unless those words are emptied of all sensible meaning and twisted into something completely fraudulent, they acknowledge that children must be protected from the very activities that the Manual advocates, since said activities not only are “likely to cause them harm,” but, manifestly, already are causing great harm.

The global-warming indoctrination frenzy of the past several years not only has caused psychological harm, but it has also negatively impacted academic achievement simply by robbing students of class time and study time that should be going to real science, as well as math, reading, history, etc.

A major study last year, “Globally Challenged: Are U.S. Students Ready to Compete?” by Harvard’s Program on Education Policy and Governance, added to the stack of reports that have been piling up for decades documenting the abysmal state of American education.

All this considered, climate change education is causing serious harm, and by the UNICEF Manual’s own words, children have a right to be protected from such abuse. But don’t expect the UN, UNICEF, or any of the other climate activists at Doha to extract any sensible meaning from the text; they are already emptying and twisting in order to fit the text around the preordained agenda.

UNICEF isn’t alone in this endeavor; as mentioned earlier, UNESCO is a senior partner on the project. And UNESCO, as the UN lead agency, oversees a vast program, which includes the Climate Change Education Clearinghouse (CCE).

The CCE is comprised of many UN agencies, including:

UN Climate Change Gateway

UNDESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs)

UNDP (United Nations Development Programme)

UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe)

UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme

UNFCCC (United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change)?UN-HABITAT (The United Nations Human Settlements Programme)

UNHCHR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner on Human Rights)

UNHCR (Office of the United Nations High Commissioner on Refugees)

UNICEF (United Nations Children’s Fund)

UNITAR (United Nations Institute for Training and Research)

WHO (World Health Organization)

WMO (World Meteorological Organization)

Among the U.S. agencies participating in the UNESCO’s Climate Change Education Clearinghouse (CCE) are:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Climate Literacy Network

National Oceanic and Atmopsheric Administration (NOAA)

National Science Foundation

United States Global Change Research Program

US Department of Energy/ARM Climate Research Facility

US Geological Survey (USGS)

One of UNESCO’s latest efforts is the newly released video, “Learning to Address Climate Change,” a snappy, professional production which shows in four minutes “why climate change education is important to shape sustainable development and how it works in practice.” UNESCO is also zeroing in on high-school students and the high-school curriculum with YouthXchange-Climate Change and Lifestyles Guidebook.

In addition, it has also published The Climate Change Starter’s Guidebook. “The aim of this guide,” says UNESCO, “is to serve as a starting point for mainstreaming climate change education into curricula lesson plans and programs.”

Moreover, the Guide informs us: 

The impacts of global warming are already apparent today in melting glaciers, increased frequency of extreme weather events such as droughts, cyclones or heavy rainfalls, sea level rise, and changes in plant growth affecting agriculture and food production. These and other observed changes are expected to intensify and inflict a significant impact on human societies and the environment around the world especially if no drastic efforts are undertaken to reduce the emissions of GHGs into the atmosphere. [Emphasis added.]

Yes, UNESCO, UNICEF and the other would-be saviors of the earth demand “drastic efforts” that inevitably involve the individual yielding his natural, God-given rights to self-government, while national governments yield their sovereignty and dissolve into a UN-run global government. Of course, the UN and its agencies have been able to propagate this long-running child-abuse scandal thanks to the massive funding they receive each year from the U.S. Congress and the executive branch agencies under the direction of the White House.

« Older Entries