Covid-19: A Plague Of Moral, Ethical And Financial Corruption. Aborted Baby Cells And Tissue Used In Covid-19 Vaccines. Christians Should File Religious Exemptions To Avoid Vaccine.

Plague of Corruption

As Long As Vaccines Are Tied To Abortion, Christians Need Exemptions

Promoting public health through vaccines seems like the right thing to do, but there’s a good reason to preserve religious exemptions: Some vaccines rely on cell lines from aborted fetal tissue.

Source: TheFederalist.com

By Gifford GrobienMAY 6, 2020

In recent years, religious exemptions from vaccination mandates have been eliminated in some states. It began in 2015 in California, followed by Maine, New York, and Washington. Although protecting ourselves and others with vaccinations seems like the reasonable and Christian thing to do, there remains a significant reason to retain religious or conscience exemptions: Several vaccinations use cell lines derived from aborted fetal tissue.

To produce vaccine antigens, viruses are propagated in host cells of other types. To maintain a ready and manageable supply of host cells, cell lines — a subculture of cells isolated from organic tissues — are maintained in laboratories. Two cell lines, named WI-38 and MRC-5, derived from the tissue of aborted fetuses, serve the manufacturing of some vaccines used in the United States.

The existence of WI-38 and MRC-5 is not new and has been defended extensively by three main arguments. First, the fetuses were not aborted for the purpose of making the vaccines. Second, these existing cell lines do not require ongoing abortions. Third, the overall benefit to public health is a worthy reason to continue manufacturing these vaccines. Let us consider these arguments in turn.

The Purpose of the Abortion

While mothers may not have had vaccines in mind when choosing abortion, abortionists and researchers had established relationships for this purpose. Researcher Leonard Hayflick sought out aborted human fetal tissue because he reasoned it would be less likely than other tissues to be contaminated by viruses. He also showed that fetal cell lines have the advantages of numerous subcultivations and susceptibility to viruses, making them ideal for mass producing vaccines.

Nineteen fetuses were used to develop cell lines WI-1 through WI-25, and after they were lost when Hayflick’s lab freezer failed, he acquired more aborted-baby tissue from a colleague in Sweden. Using this tissue, Hayflick developed more cell lines, with line WI-38 continuing to be used today for vaccine production. Strain MRC-5 was developed from an aborted baby for the purpose of vaccine development.

While parents are not seeking abortions to populate cell lines for vaccine manufacturing, researchers and abortionists recognize the benefit of fetal tissue for vaccine development, and have established relationships to facilitate the supply of this tissue to researchers. Research might be an indirect purpose of abortion, but it is still the intent of some parties involved.

Most lay people today reason, “Of course I’m not participating in the abortions. I wasn’t there. I didn’t encourage the mothers to abort. I wasn’t looking for tissue to develop a vaccine.” If one is not complicit in the abortion, what’s the harm in trying to bring some good out of it?

To make a cell line, the parts of the aborted body are minced, treated with an enzyme solution, and centrifuged into individual living cells to be cultured in a nourishing serum. These cells are subcultured and multiplied. Current cell lines WI-38 and MRC-5 are living cells, derived from the fetus, carrying the same DNA as the body from which they came.

Unlike the abortion itself, which could be distanced from our experience as a singular event in history, the ongoing use of the aborted body continues today, serving the demand for some vaccines.

No More Abortion?

Although advocates of these vaccines argue no more abortions are needed, new cell lines derived from aborted fetal tissue continue to be developed. Researchers are concerned that cell reproduction in these strains will eventually become nonviable, or at least more difficult to access.

They are also motivated to discover increased duplication rates, higher limits to duplication, and improved suitability for viral propagation. Researchers have developed cell lines — including IMR-90IMR-91PER.C6, and Walvax-2 — from aborted fetuses, with the intent of supplementing or replacing WI-38 and MRC-5 for vaccine development.

Demand for these vaccines gives implicit abortion approval for fetal tissue research. Promoting products of abortion encourages the partnership between abortion providers and medical researchers, as well as the social acceptance of this partnership. For example, President Bill Clinton justified federal funding for fetal tissue research by the success of these vaccines. While President George W. Bush said, “We do not end some lives for the medical benefit of others,” he allowed “federal funding for research on existing stem cell lines.”

Following the 2015 criticisms against Planned Parenthood for providing fetal tissue for research, researchers responded that such experimentation is necessary, has great benefits, and should continue, pointing specifically to the precedent of vaccine development. While the Trump administration recently ended government funding for most fetal tissue research, the policy change does nothing to alter the legality of fetal tissue research. Recent efforts to develop a vaccine for COVID-19 have again raised the question of the ethics of using fetal cell lines.

Public Health Benefit

What of the ill effects of the diseases these vaccines are given to prevent? Rubella, in particular, can be devastating to the unborn. Would we fail to love our neighbor if we had an effective vaccine yet did not use it?

Even pro-life leaders have expressed their approval of using vaccines produced with fetal cell lines, in cases with no alternative. The Vatican allowed the use of those vaccines for a “proportionate reason:” The overall defense of life expressed by vaccination against rubella was more significant than a boycott of these vaccines, especially if users expressed their objections and recognized the use was under a kind of duress.

Proponents of these vaccines twist the Vatican’s words to sound like approval: The use of such vaccines “was certainly justifiable,” does not “defy the religion’s doctrine,” raises “no theological objection,” and is “morally acceptable.” Yet a careful read of the Vatican’s essay in no way gives this impression.

The Vatican maintained that the preparation, marketing, and use of such vaccines is illicit, and their use can be allowed only because it occurs under coercion. It named the current situation “an unjust alternative choice, which must be eliminated as soon as possible.” Using the vaccines can be justified only if it does more to defend, uphold, and promote life by preventing disease than the refusal to use these vaccines.

The Vatican gave this advice in 2005, with the expectation that Christians’ objections would eventually lead to alternative vaccines. Unfortunately, the guidance did little to disrupt the widespread acceptance of vaccines using fetal cell lines. Rather, in 2009, Merck discontinued the separate measles and mumps vaccines, and offered them only as a combination with the rubella vaccine as MMR or MMRV, both of which use fetal cell lines.

Yet developing and manufacturing vaccines that do not use fetal cell lines is quite possible. Japanese manufacturers have produced both rubella and hepatitis A vaccines using nonhuman cell sources. However, they are not licensed for use in the United States.

Religious Exemptions as Part of a Unified Public Voice

Without clear, firm Christian voices objecting to these vaccines, and without demand for alternatives, it is unlikely any replacements will be developed or made available in the United States. Many Christians are simply unaware of this connection between some vaccines and abortion. We need active and regular publicity of this connection to raise awareness.

The Christian public voice should be clear and consistent. With legislative trends going against religious exemptions, strong statements from religious leaders and institutions become increasingly important. Although federal case law recognizes religious liberty to some extent, official church statements will strengthen individual claims.

Even if official statements don’t say whether we should or shouldn’t get a vaccine, they should uphold the conscience rights to object to vaccine use. Without such institutional support for conscientious decisions, individuals have difficulty arguing for religious exemption.

Christians should also ask providers for alternative vaccines, or, where alternatives do not exist, that they be developed. Such requests can be made of providers, but should especially be communicated formally to vaccine manufacturers and distributors. In some cases, Christians may choose to refuse vaccinations manufactured with cell strains developed from abortions.

In these ways, Christian laity and pastors can embrace a firm stance that the world cannot confuse as acceptance of the status quo. Christians should make clear that the perpetuation of objectionable vaccines and the lack of alternatives is a kind of coercion. A strong Christian voice can restore a situation in which churches have nothing to do with abortion, no longer accepting health benefits at the cost of others’ lives.

download (36)

Dr Mikovits: Vaccine Could Kill Tens of Millions in America

Source: vidrebel.wordpress.com
 

Why would you give a vaccine to someone who already has an antibody? They have already been exposed and have developed an immunoglobulin response to a past infection. Why not use the people who have developed immunity to help protect vulnerable populations? Why aren’t we using Hydroxychloroquine, zinc, vitamin D 3 and Type 1 Interferons. Lockdowns are criminal extortions. People are harmed because they cannot work and pay their bills. It will be very difficult to detox from a covid vaccine you were forced to take just to get back to work. You are only protecting 0.1 to 0.3% of the population who would be at risk from the coronavirus? Our herd immunity is almost already here.

Vaccines do not prevent infection. You are injecting the blueprint of the system and letting a compromised immune system deal with it. A natural immunity has lock and key receptors, gatekeepers so what you have done is allowed a nanoparticle enter every cell without that receptor. Can you imagine the damage that will be done when you bypass God’s natural immunity? That blueprint of the coronavirus also has strands of the HIV virus. That means you can infect your white blood cells. This is a recipe for mass murder where 50 million Americans could be killed.

The above was a quote from Dr Judy Mikovits from the video below in references. When she said 50 million, she went on to talk of the 40 year span during which the XMRV (Xenotropic Murine Leukemia Related Virus) killed millions of people so she is not saying that many will die in 2021. XMRV is a retrovirus found in mice that was transferred into US vaccines. Big Pharma never uses a clean needle when a dirty needle is available.

There is good news on the inability of the vaccine makers to deliver a vaccine that passes even rudimentary safety standards. It must be emphasized that 4 promising vaccines for SARs were produced. They all had very good antibody counts. Then they encountered the wild SARs virus and the vaccinated subjects started dying like flies. Since these rushed vaccines will not face challenges from a wild virus in the testing phase, the vaccination program will stop when the first wave of vaccinated test subjects die.

There is another problem. Bill Gates smirked when he said, “They aren’t paying attention to this virus but they will pay attention when the next one arrives.” He is saying that after we have been vaccinated and chipped that our Global Masters will release Bioweapon 2 which unlike covid will not have to rely on hype to scare us. This one will kill us by the tens of millions, especially the vaccinated ones.

I have mentioned before that we just entered a Grand Solar Minimum much like the Maunder Minimum of 1645 to 1715. In a video below food prices are reviewed during that period. The price of food spiked 4 to 7 times normal in certain bad crop years and stayed high for 3 to 5 years before going back down. The NWO Bankers want population reduction in the billions before the food shortages send the masses into an insane frenzy attacking even billionaires and other exempt agents of Globalism.

As I said before, in 1709 during the Maunder Minimum the Big Freeze was caused by the eruption of 3 volcanoes in Europe sending so much ash into the sky that sunlight was  partially blocked. That was sufficient to freeze the ground in France to a depth of one meter or nearly 40 inches. Food prices rose 650%. If that happened today, a billion or more people would die.

We have entered a period where the sun’s magnetism is reduced so many more cosmic rays (nuclear particles from distant stars) will strike the earth energizing volcanic magma chambers and earthquake fault zones. It seems we will have massive earth changes in our future over the next several decades.

A failure to meet their vaccine goals and to plant chips in us could create a situation where the people would be forced to rebel just to get something to eat.

Fear for their lives might convince the NWO Masters to not release Bioweapon 2.

Also in 2021 we will see a crashing economy as we reach unprecedented levels of Unpayable Debts in need of cancellation. Under our corrupt system, Unpayable Dents are only cancelled through hyperinflation (Germany 1923) or through bankruptcy court and foreclosures (America 1933.) I do not know the figures for Germany but 3 million Gentiles starved to death in America in that period.

The NWO needs to avoid a starving population to remain safe in their mansions. They need a series of vaccines to be followed by Bioweapon 2 to clear the decks of a billion people worldwide. They expect you as a good citizen to die and to make the world a better place for billionaires.

The Vaccines Are Worse Than Dr Mikovits Thought

Source: vidrebel.wordpress.com

Posted on November 19, 2020

Dr Judy Mikovits said that this coronavirus vaccine could kill 50 million Americans over the next 40 years. The versions being released by Pfizer and Moderna require storage at minus 70 degrees Celsius (minus 94 F) and might be far more deadly than even she originally estimated.

Why so cold? Children’s Health Defense explained in an August 6th article, “mRNA vaccines undergoing Covid-19 clinical trials, including the Moderna vaccine, rely on a nanoparticle-based “carrier system” containing a synthetic chemical called polyethylene glycol (PEG).”

The use of PEG (polyethylene glycol) in drugs and vaccines is increasingly controversial due to the well-documented incidence of adverse PEG-related immune reactions, including life-threatening anaphylaxis.

Roughly seven in ten Americans may already be sensitized to PEG, which may result in reduced efficacy of the vaccine and an increase in adverse side effects.

If a PEG-containing mRNA vaccine for Covid-19 gains FDA approval, the uptick in exposure to PEG will be unprecedented—and potentially disastrous.

Moderna documents and publications indicate that the company is well aware of safety risks associated with PEG and other aspects of its mRNA technology but is more concerned with its bottom line.

Lipid nanoparticles cause hyperinflammatory responses in the body, leading to severe reactions, hospitalization and potentially Death.

Why are LNPs (Lipid Nanoparticles) used in these vaccines? As Children’s Health Defense   further explains:

Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) “encapsulate the mRNA constructs to protect them from degradation and promote cellular uptake” and, additionally, rev up the immune system (a property that vaccine scientists tamely describe as LNPs’ “inherent adjuvant properties”)

In other words, the LNPs are adjuvants, meaning they are designed to cause hyperinflammatory responses in human beings, once injected. This is done in an effort to induce the creation of antibodies that then allow the vaccine manufacturer to claim high “effectiveness” rates, even when those very same adjuvants cause severe adverse reactions.

According to recent vaccine trials conducted by Moderna, 100% of human subjects in the high-dose vaccine trial group experienced adverse reactions.

So why are Moderna and Pfizer using mRNA (messenger RNA) in a vaccine? They want to reprogram human DNA as an experiment and see what happens to our progeny. Critics in the UK say a side effect is sterilization which is good for the Powers That Ought Not To Be because they want to rid the earth of 6 billion plus commoners.

Update at 4:50 AM. From the Australian Independent:

These new vaccines are in an entirely new class all by themselves. They are known as “messenger RNA” (mRNA) vaccines, and they work by hijacking the protein-making machinery in your cells…

When Moderna was just finishing its Phase I trial, The Independent wrote about the vaccine and described it this way: “It uses a sequence of genetic RNA material produced in a lab that, when injected into your body, must invade your cells and hijack your cells’ protein-making machinery called ribosomes to produce the viral components that subsequently train your immune system to fight the virus.”

“In this case, Moderna’s mRNA-1273 is programmed to make your cells produce the coronavirus’ infamous coronavirus spike protein that gives the virus its crown-like appearance (corona is crown in Latin) for which it is named,” wrote The Independent. End Update:

The Astra Zeneca vaccine does not require minus 70 degree Celsius storage and transport facilities because they are not using mRNA to reprogram the human body. But they are using a human fetus as an adjuvant. An adjuvant helps the vaccine to develop a heightened immune response. In this case they are using MRC-5 which is from the lung tissue  of an aborted 14 week old Caucasian male. Adjuvants stir up your immune system. MRC-5  which is the DNA from that aborted baby is seen by your body as an invasion and mounts a defense.

American children have so many vaccine injuries by the time they are 21 that over half have diseases and syndromes that nobody had seen in these numbers before the 1960s when Big Pharma began rolling out so many more vaccines.

Now we know why Israel has opted to use the Russian vaccine and refused Pfizer, Moderna and Astra Zeneca’s offers.

The modern diet, the pesticides, the herbicides, the vaccines and the drugs of Big Pharma have created an epidemic on inflammatory conditions in modern men, women and children. Are we prepared to treat hyperinflammatory cases by the tens of millions?

The Englishwoman in the video below shows the Astra Zeneca insert which admits to using MRC-5 or human fetus body parts. She also says that the British government is looking for an AI system to help them collate and interpret the information when vaccines injuries and deaths mount up.

Bill Gates once smirked and said people are not paying attention to this virus but they will pay attention to the next one.  (Are you prepared for Bioweapon 2?)

I think it is best that we skip this vaccine. Let everyone in the Gates family, in Big Pharma, in Corporate Media, on Wall Street, in the House and Senate, at the CDC and NIH take this vaccine first.

I confess to a love for animals so I think it is best that we skip animal testing when there are plenty of despicable human beings available.

Of course I would still refuse these vaccines because I do not believe Bill Gates should have the right to reprogram the DNA of 7 billion people just because he thinks it is a good idea.

The death rate is very low for people who were not going to die anyway from heart disease, cancer, COPD, drug overdoses, terminal kidney and liver diseases, automobile wrecks and suicide. If we all took vitamin D-3, the covid death rate would be less than the flu. I would add Quercetin and zinc to bring it even lower.

This is the article in which Dr Mikovits said 50 million Americans could die from this vaccine. But notice she does not mention the nanoparticles which could very easily be far more dangerous to human health than regular molecules which do produce inflammations. Hyperinflammations might cause serious illness and death.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.