Monthly Archives: November 2018

Amazon Bans Book Holy Serpent Of the Jews By Texe Marrs.

Holy Serpent of the Jews, has been banned by The subtitle of this book perhaps provides a clue as to why Amazon would wish to suppress this powerful information. The subtitle reads: The Rabbis’ Secret Plan for Satan to Crush Their Enemies and Vault the Jews to Global Dominion.

Banned by Amazon: Book Truthfully Quoting Rabbis

Wanna read a book about ghoulish sex perversions, maybe something about child torture, cannibalism, witchcraft or some blood fetish?, the world’s largest bookseller, has it for you. In fact, Amazon has about seven million books and volumes covering the waterfront of sex crimes, incest, bestiality, and occult deviance.

Whatever evil or mind-bending hedonistic pleasure you’re into, Amazon’s got just the right book for you. For example, discover the depths of Satanism by ordering Anton LaVey’s monstrous The Satanic Bible. It’s on Amazon’s bestseller list. That one book alone has warped the lives of tens of thousands of young readers prone to its heinous lies. The Satanic Bible recommends the human sacrifice of innocent children. So if you’re into that, help yourself. Order the infamous book through

And if it’s dirty politics and scummy social ideology you’re into, you’ll want to investigate some of Amazon’s political titles, like The Communist Manifesto, by Karl Marx, or the many titles written by America-haters and socialist ideologues, such as books by Saul Alinsky and Leon Trotsky.

But with all these evil titles that are for sale, including perverted volumes by Aleister Crowley, the British Satanist who boasted of being “666” and “the most wicked man on planet earth,” and the scourge of bondage and sadism, the Marquis de Sade, there’s one title that Amazon now refuses to handle and sell. That would be my book, Holy Serpent of the Jews.

Jeff Bezos, owner of Amazon, is the billionaire who owns both that global company and the disreputable newspaper, The Washington Post.

Holy Serpent Banned by Amazon

Amazon has informed me by email that Holy Serpent of the Jews does not meet the company’s “Content Guidelines.” The hideous books by LaVey and Crowley, not to mention the graphic photo book, Sex, by Madonna, and the new book by Lena Dunham, in which she describes how she once sexually abused her little sister, do presumably meet Amazon guidelines.

Now, please consider: Holy Serpent of the Jews has no graphic sex. The book contains no profanity, none whatsoever. What it does, however, is quote actual Jewish rabbis, modern and ancient. Amazon, owned by Mr. Jeff Bezos, himself a Jew, is apparently incensed at my quoting of these rabbis.

Moreover, Holy Serpent of the Jews quotes not only top, authoritative rabbis, it also quotes Judaism’s most holy book, the Babylonian Talmud, and it quotes the Jewish Kabbalah, which thousands of rabbis regularly quote and teach from. This, too, apparently, is too much for Mr. Bezos to stomach.

Lies Preferred Over Truth?

You see, I, as author, am not a Jew. But I am a religious authority, and a world-famous expert on the religious cult known as Judaism. What I witness in Holy Serpent of the Jews about Judaism will stand up in any court in the world, except perhaps in Israel. In Israel, as at, truth is not a defense. To Jeff Bezos and the Amazon officials, apparently lies are acceptable, yes, even preferred.

So, Holy Serpent of the Jews is being suppressed by the world’s largest bookseller. This, to me, is a badge of honor. What will I do about this travesty in which a book that is honest and authoritative is removed, like the politically incorrect news clips that abruptly went down George Orwell’s “memory hole” in 1984? We will continue to offer this book and leave the sales up to our Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ.

Why are we so very insistent on continuing to sell Holy Serpent of the Jews? Simply because we strongly believe that Jews and Gentiles alike are chosen by a loving God for redemption and a future of contentment. As I state on p. 16 of the book, “The New Testament…proclaims that Jesus Christ has chosen His people out of all the nations and races on earth. Jews, Gentiles it makes no difference to Jesus: ‘Whosoever will may come.’”

My prayer is that all who read this book will believe in the saving words of Jesus Christ, and come to the Cross of Calvary.


Over Half Of America Gets More In Welfare Than It Pays In Taxes.
by Tyler Durden
Wed, 10/24/2018 – 15:50

Authored by Ryan McMaken via The Mises Institute,

More than half of Americans receive more money in various types of government transfer payments (Medicare, Medicaid, food stamps, Social Security) than they pay in federal taxes.


According to a report released this year by the Congressional Budget Office, only the top two income quintiles in the United States pay more in taxes than they receive in government transfers.



Not surprisingly, the lowest income quintiles receive far more in transfers than they pay in taxes:

In the lowest quintile, households pay only $400 in taxes (as of 2014, the most recent data available) while receiving more than $16,000 in various types of tax-funded transfer payments.

The end result is households in the bottom three quintiles have higher incomes after taxes and transfers than they do before taxes and transfers:

The second-to-top quintile is slightly worse off after taxes and transfers, and the highest quintile is sizably worse off. In other words, the top two income quintiles are subsidizing the bottom three, and the advantage, proportionally speaking, gets larger as income goes down.
The Politics of a Majority on the Dole

The political implications of this are considerable. As Ludwig von Mises once noted, once we get to the point that a majority of the voting population receives more in benefits than it pays in taxes, then voters will demand more and more wealth be transferred to them through government programs. It will then become politically necessary to extract larger and larger amounts of wealth from a minority in order to subsidize the majority.

Market economics will become less and less popular because the voters will have realized they can — in the words of James Bovard — “vote for a living” instead of work for a living.

These findings don’t always apply at the level of the individual household, of course. In the middle quintile, especially, we’ll find some households that are indeed worse off after taxes and transfers than before. This will especially be the case for households that do not yet receive old-age benefits such as Medicare and Social Security. Those households are currently being taxed to pay for current recipients of SS and Medicare. Later, however, those households will begin to receive those benefits. And, over a lifetime, they’re likely to receive more in benefits than what they “paid in.” This notion of “paying in,” however, is pure fiction, and there is no “trust fund” for old-age benefits, and all benefits received at any given time are funded via taxation of current wage earners.

As far as politics goes, this latter fact is very important because voters receiving old-age benefits know that any significant cut in government spending and government taxation is likely to necessitate a decline in paid benefits. This is why neither major party ever seriously talks about cutting Medicare or Social Security, and why Donald Trump has even recently declared his own love for Medicare. It’s simply a redistribution of income and wealth from current wage earners to current recipients, and for most elected officials, attempting to cut these benefits would be political suicide.

At the low end, benefits more frequently take the form of “means-tested” benefits such as Medicaid and food stamps. And since these benefits are geared toward low-income earners, we naturally see more benefits going toward the lowest earners. Indeed, in the lowest quintile, market income is less than half of income after taxes and transfers.

But for many voters, the reality is this: any significant cuts in federal spending will mean less government benefits, either now or later.

(And don’t forget that the data here doesn’t even account for government employees whose “market” income is also government funded. In the case of those workers, cuts in government spending will reduce both their market income and their transfer income.)

Since many households at both the lowest end and near the middle receive more in benefits than they pay in taxes, we end up with a situation in which the voters think tax cuts don’t benefit them much — but spending cuts definitely do hurt them.

Thus, the political outcome is one in which there is plenty of political pressure to maintain spending levels — or increase them — while tax cuts aren’t as popular.
Transfer Income Is Growing as a Portion of Market Incomes

Looking at transfer incomes as a percentage of market incomes, by quintile, we find significant growth since the dot-com bust of 2001:

With the lowest quintile, transfer payments declined during the 1990’s economic expansion, and in the wake of the 1996 welfare reform. But government transfer payments grew again following the 2001-2002 recession. Transfers dipped again as the US approached the 2008 bust, and have grown sizably ever since.

Indeed, as of 2014, transfers by this measure were at an all-time high for the second-to-lowest quintile, and were near an all-time hight for the lowest quintile.

But in all quintiles, transfers have increased proportional to market income, whether due to stagnating market income or growing transfer payments. an increasing role for transfer payments can also give a false impression of overall income growth since official income numbers, as provided by federal agencies such as the Census Bureau, usually include transfer payments and other taxpayer-funded sources of income in the income data. Basically, transfer payments are padding the income data — paid for by the top income quintiles.
Perceptions Matter

Like all statistics of this sort, though, we can’t get a complete picture from this alone. This data only tells us about transfer payments — which are easy to track — and doesn’t tell us much about the many other ways that governments transfer wealth and income. For instance, we must also consider how regulations negatively impact the incomes of employees and business owners at all levels. And we must not ignore how money-supply inflation tends to hurt the poor the most, while tending to favor higher-income groups. And then there are government contracts — such as high-tech weapons contracts that tend to benefit higher income groups as well.

Ultimately, though, perceptions often matter more than the details behind the numbers. The CBO report reminds us that a great many voters receive government welfare checks of various types, and the perception is that any true cuts in spending will bring a high cost to those who have become accustomed to their taxpayer funded benefits. Ultimately, the effects on voting patters and public policy will be very real.

Los Angeles Takes Aim At NRA Members.

download (21)

Los Angeles Takes Aim AT NRA

The LA City Council voted to draft a law requiring contractors looking to do business with the city to disclose ties to the gun lobby.

By California News Wire Services, News Partner | Oct 10, 2018 3:46 pm ET | Updated Oct 10, 2018 3:51 pm ET

LOS ANGELES, CA — The Los Angeles City Council approved a motion Wednesday that would require city contractors to disclose any ties they have to the National Rifle Association.

Councilman Mitch O’Farrell’s motion, which was approved on a 10-0 vote, would not ban NRA-connected contractors from doing business with the city, but would require them to disclose any contracts or sponsorships they have with the gun rights advocacy group.

The NRA has not responded to a request for comment.

“The roadblock to gun safety legislation across the United States is the National Rifle Association,” O’Farrell said during a meeting of the Budget and Finance Committee earlier this month before it approved the motion. “Although gun safety legislation has been enacted by some individual states, especially here in California, the NRA’s lock on Congress and the Senate is such that no gun safety legislation has been enacted at the federal level since 1994 with the assault weapons ban. Than ban expired in 2004.”

The City Council approved a similar ordinance last year that requires contractors or prospective contractors to disclose that they have placed bids on President Donald Trump’s proposed border wall. Although it did not ban those contractors from working with the city, the ordinance sent the message that Los Angeles would be unlikely to hire a contractor with ties to the wall. The vote by the council on the NRA motion directs the city attorney to draft an ordinance outlining the new disclosure rules, which will need to be voted on by the City Council.

The motion says the city of Los Angeles historically has enacted ordinances in support of gun safety without objection, and that 1,600 mass shootings have happened in America since the Sandy Hook Elementary School mass shooting in 2012, citing the Gun Violence Archive, which quantifies a mass shooting as when four or more people are wounded or killed, not including the shooter.

“For the sake of transparency, the city’s residents and stakeholders deserve to know how the city’s public funds are being spent, and whether taxpayer funds are being spent on contractors that have contractual or sponsorship ties with the NRA,” the motion states.

Following the mass shooting at Stoneman Douglas High School in Florida on Feb. 14, a number of corporations that had offered discounts to NRA members cut ties with the organization, including Delta Air Lines, United Airlines and the Hertz rental car firm.

O’Farrell’s motion does not state if the city currently has any contractors with ties to the NRA.

City News Service; Photo: Shutterstock

The Devil New Balance 666 Shoe Autographed By Bill and Hillary Clinton.

The Devil’s New Balance Is Autographed by Bill and Hillary Clinton

The latest episode of ‘One of One.’

In the latest episode of One of One, we take a look at something a little different. Collector Richie Roxas shares his story about the questionably named New Balance 666 signed by Bill and Hillary Clinton.

Roxas says he acquired the sneaker off of Ebay for $200. It was signed by the Clintons in 1992, a few months before Bill Clinton was elected President of the United States. Even the owner jokes about how signing this sneaker was the husband and wife politicians showing their approval of the devil due to the silhouette’s number. Only one shoe remains from the pair, which boasts both signatures. The model itself isn’t the most flattering—the all-white low top looks like it was made strictly for the 65 and up crowd.

United States Navy WarShip Shoots Down Missile In Space In Show Of Strength.

STAR WARS! US warship shoots down missile in space with ballistic ‘kill vehicle’


The intercept weapon was launched by warship USS John Finn (Image: Missile Defence Agency)

Click Here For Video.

Dramatic footage has emerged of a US warship shooting down a missile in space with a spectacular intercept weapon.

The video, released by the US Navy, shows the USS John Finn attempting to hit a medium-range ballistic missile.

A similar experiment earlier in the year failed but this time it manages to successfully hit the missile in space.

The SM-3 Block, dubbed ‘Kill Vehicle,’ reportedly uses brute force as opposed to an explosive warhead to eliminate its target, with the firm who make the missile claiming it hits its target with the power of a ‘ten-tonne truck’ travelling at ‘600mph’.

The technique has been likened to hitting a bullet with another bullet, which is why this test was dubbed a “superb accomplishment” by a US Navy official.

The target was a test missile launched from Pacific Missile Range Facility at Kauai, Hawaii.


(Image: Missile Defence Agency)

Defense Agency (MDA) said: “Sailors aboard USS John Finn successfully conducted an intercept of a medium-range ballistic missile target with a Standard Missile-3 (SM-3) Block IIA missile during a flight test off the west coast of Hawaii.”

The ‘Kill Vehicle’ is being “developed cooperatively by the US and Japan” and will form part of America’s coastline defence.

“This was a superb accomplishment and key milestone for the SM-3 Block IIA return to flight,” said Lt. General Sam Greaves.

“My congratulations to the entire team, including our sailors, industry partners, and allies who helped achieve this milestone.”

This is the second time the weapon has been been successfully tested, following two consecutive failures.

“Based on observations and initial data review, the test met its objectives, according to the Agency. Program officials will continue to evaluate the system’s performance,” the MDA’s statement said.

The first successful test of this particular SM-3 Block happened in February 2017 but the two after that failed, with the latest coming in January this year.

The weapon can be launched from land or sea and, according to the Missile Defense Agency, will form a key part of the AEGIS Ballistic Missile Defense system.

The successful test of the ‘Kill Vehicle’ is likely to send a warning to both North Korea and Russia.